|

National Press Market Round-Up – 2002

National Press Market Round-Up – 2002

In terms of circulation the national press market had a less successful year in 2002 than in the previous year, when the industry was boosted by a renewed demand for news following the terrorist attacks on the United States. Overall circualtion for national newspapers was down by 2.8% year on year during 2002. The daily quality market and the popular Sunday market were the worst hit, with circulation declining by 3.2% and 5.3% respectively during 2002. The daily popular market escaped relatively unscathed with circulation slipping by 0.6% year on year.

January – December 2002 ABC Market Comparisons
Daily Market 2001 2002 Actual Change % Change YoY
Quality 2,960,042 2,866,403 -93,639 -3.2
Mid 3,471,463 3,388,524 -82,939 -2.4
Popular 6,491,108 6,450,923 -40,185 -0.6
Sunday Market        
Quality 2,954,316 2,861,852 -92,464 -3.1
Mid 3,326,495 3,284,427 -42,068 -1.3
Popular 7,597,737 7,192,164 -405,573 -5.3
TOTAL 26,801,161 26,044,293 -756,868 -2.8

Analysis of NRS readership figures paints a more positive picture of the national press market, which saw readership increase by 1.2% year on year during 2002. The daily quality and daily mid-market experienced notable gains, with readership increasing by 7.8% and 4.3% respectively. The quality Sunday market also performed well with readership rising by 7.5% during 2002, but the popular Sunday market slipped by 4.1% during the same period.

January-December 2002 NRS Market Comparisons
Daily Market 2001 2002 Actual Change % Change YoY
Quality 8,229,000 8,870,000 641,000 7.8
Mid 7,682,000 8,013,000 331,000 4.3
Popular 16,692,000 16,725,000 33,000 0.2
Sunday Market        
Quality 6,865,000 7,380,000 515,000 7.5
Mid 8,161,000 8,213,000 52,000 0.6
Popular 18,956,000 18,172,000 -784,000 -4.1
TOTAL 66,585,000 67,373,000 788,000 1.2

Quality Market

In terms of circulation, 2002 was a relatively lacklustre year for the quality market, with the majority of titles seeing circulation decline year on year. The Independent On Sunday and the Sunday Telegraph were the worst hit, with circulation falling by 8.54% and 5.66% respectively. News International’s heavy weight Times also suffered, with circulation slipping by 4.53% during 2002.

The Daily Telegraph provided an example to the industry by ending the practice of bulk sales in October (see Telegraph Group Puts An End To Bulk Sales). However, the title saw circulation decline by 4.26% year on year to below the million mark. The Guardian and its Sunday sibling The Observer experienced the least downward movement, with circulation dropping by 3.05% and 1.08% respectively. Meanwhile, the Sunday Business provided the only bright spot in an otherwise gloomy market, with circulation soaring by 44.06% year on year.

National Quality Market January-December 2002 ABC Comparisons
Title 2001 2002 Actual Change % Ch
Business, The 57,572 82,937 25,365 44.06
Daily Telegraph 1,036,813 992,671 -44,142 -4.26
Financial Times 491,153 469,625 -21,528 -4.38
Guardian 412,545 399,971 -12,574 -3.05
Independent 232,062 224,396 -7,666 -3.30
Independent On Sunday 249,574 228,255 -21,319 -8.54
Observer 466,419 458,043 -8,376 -1.80
Sunday Telegraph 824,549 777,878 -46,671 -5.66
Sunday Times 1,413,774 1,397,676 -16,098 -1.14
Times 729,897 696,803 -33,094 -4.53

In terms of readership, the biggest increases were seen at the Guardian and the Observer, which improved by 20.2% and 15.2% respectively during 2002. The Independent On Sunday corrected a decline in circulation with a 3.1% year on year increase in readership, but the Sunday Telegraph slipped by 0.4%.

The sector’s most notable decline was experienced by the Financial Times, which saw readership fall by 10.4% to 567,000.

National Quality Market January-December 2002 NRS Comparisons
Title 2001 2002 Actual Change % Ch
Daily Telegraph 2,284,000 2,410,000 126,000 5.5
Financial Times 633,000 567,000 -66,000 -10.4
Guardian 1,104,000 1,327,000 223,000 20.2
Independent 545,000 584,000 39,000 7.2
Independent On Sunday 614,000 633,000 19,000 3.1
Observer 1,122,000 1,293,000 171,000 15.2
Sunday Telegraph 2,071,000 2,062,000 -9,000 -0.4
Sunday Times 3,058,000 3,392,000 334,000 10.9
Times 1,659,000 1,808,000 149,000 9.0

Mid Market

Things looked more positive for Richard Desmond’s Express titles in 2002, with the Sunday Express seeing circulation increase by 1.6% year on year and the Daily Express managing to limit its decline to 1.5%. The fortunes of the Daily Mail and the Mail On Sunday also appeared to be changing, with circulation slipping by 2.7% and 2.3% respectively. However, the Daily Mail & General Trust-owned titles continue to retain a healthy lead over their competitors.

National Mid Market January-December 2002 ABC Comparisons
Title 2001 2002 Actual Change % Ch
Daily Express 976,777 961,705 -15,072 -1.5
Daily Mail 2,494,686 2,426,819 -67,867 -2.7
Mail On Sunday 2,419,977 2,363,661 -56,316 -2.3
Sunday Express 906,518 920,766 14,248 1.6

In terms of readership, The Daily Express saw the most significant upward movement, with readership increasing by 8.5% year on year. However, this was off-set by a 2.2% decline at the Sunday Express. Both the Daily Mail and the Mail On Sunday saw readership increase year on year during 2002.

National Mid Market January-December 2002 NRS Comparisons
Title 2001 2002 Actual Change % Ch
Daily Express 2,004,000 2,174,000 170,000 8.5
Daily Mail 5,678,000 5,839,000 161,000 2.8
Mail On Sunday 5,929,000 6,029,000 100,000 1.7
Sunday Express 2,232,000 2,184,000 -48,000 -2.2

Popular Market

Every title within the popular market saw circulation decline year on year during 2002, with the exception of Northern & Shell’s Daily Star, which improved by 12.4% to 805,714. Despite commanding a comparatively modest circulation, the success of the no-nonsense title prompted Richard Desmond to launch the Daily Star Sunday last September (see NewsLine Feature: Sunday Star Hopes To Shine).

Elsewhere, a multimillion pound redesign and change of editorial focus (see Mirror Drops Red Top For New Look) did not appear to boost Trinity Mirror’s Daily Mirror, which saw circulation fall by 5.1% year on year to 2,115,529. The Sun also saw suffered, although to a lesser degree, after entering into a costly coverprice war with its arch rival. Circulation at the title was down by 0.5% year on year to 3,529,680. The sector’s most significant downward movement was seen at the People, which saw circulation fall by 9.7% year on year, despite an extensive rebrand (see Trinity Mirror Relaunches Sunday People).

National Popular Market January-December 2002 ABC Comparisons
Title 2001 2002 Actual Change % Ch
Daily Mirror 2,228,361 2,115,529 -112,832 -5.1
Daily Star 716,826 805,714 88,888 12.4
News Of The World 4,086,335 3,958,222 -128,113 -3.1
People 1,427,760 1,289,126 -138,634 -9.7
Sun 3,545,921 3,529,680 -16,241 -0.5
Sunday People 1,880,489 1,754,784 -125,705 -6.7
Sunday Sport 203,153 190,032 -13,121 -6.5

In terms of readership, the outlook was more mixed with the Daily Star and the Sun improving by 11.5% and 1% respectively. At the other end of the scale, the Daily Mirror and the News Of The World both saw readership decline by 4.3% year on year during 2002. The People was the worst hit with readership slipping by 4.7% during the same period.

National Popular Market January-December 2002 NRS Comparisons
Title 2001 2002 Actual Change % Ch
Daily Mirror 5,712,000 5,468,000 -244,000 -4.3
Daily Star 1,572,000 1,752,000 180,000 11.5
News Of The World 10,318,000 9,876,000 -442,000 -4.3
People 3,092,000 2,948,000 -144,000 -4.7
Sun 9,408,000 9,505,000 97,000 1.0
Sunday Mirror 5,546,000 5,348,000 -198,000 -3.6

Subscribers can access the Press database by selecting “Press” from the drop-down box at the top of this page.

Media Jobs