|

Achieving the Holy Grail of great branded content

Achieving the Holy Grail of great branded content

Dean Baker

Dean Baker, head of JWT Entertainment at JWT London, explains how to achieve the Holy Grail of successful branded content.

UK advertising is on the brink of change: with product placement regulations waiting in the wings to be finalised, it’s only a matter of time before brand names and product shots become a natural part of TV viewing. But how much of an impact will this shift have? Our global friends have been adopting the approach for years, and so UK consumers exposed to foreign exports such as American Idol or the Mission: Impossible films have already experienced placement in their TV and film viewing.

The issue is not how consumers will adapt to the supposed shock of seeing products advertised in this way, but whether it will actually change their behaviour as a result. The key to any advertising campaign is not how much exposure a brand has or how obviously it is displayed, but how engaging it is for the consumer. If brands are portrayed in a manner that captivates the audience and actively invites them to interact and continue the experience, the campaign has succeeded, whether it’s a traditional ad, brand integration or specially made ad-funded content.

Branded content is undoubtedly going to be the next big thing for the advertising industry. With consumers becoming more powerful than ever in terms of their content consumption, and on-demand tools meaning they can control how much advertising they are exposed to, it’s essential that brands find new and innovative ways to get in front of their audiences.

What we are doing with JWT Entertainment, which launched in January, is bringing brands, content creators and advertisers together to partner on producing great content. We see it as our role to guide our clients in this direction and ensure that we are creating engaging material which actively encourages consumer participation.

Currently, although ad-funded programmes do exist (The Krypton Factor and Orange Playlist, for example), there are still huge opportunities to push the boundaries, to bring advertising and entertainment together, and become part of social culture. If we are to create material which entertains audiences and engages each consumer, we need to think big and deliver quality, high impact entertainment.

The key is to get the balance between establishing the right level of presence for the brand and not overloading the consumer with messaging. UK consumers are cynical enough towards advertising that any overt branding will put them off entirely, regardless of whether the content is entertaining or not. The solution may sound obvious, but it’s vital that brands and advertisers choose exactly the right fit when planning AFP; choosing a theme or format that has an obvious affinity with the brand’s marketing campaign will ensure that consumers accept the association and don’t see it as gratuitous product placement.

It’s also essential to avoid overkill: for example, even though the brands used in the Sex and the City movie provided the right fit with the film, arguably the products were shoehorned in so many times that they ultimately served as an irritant to viewers rather than adding to the value of their experience. Moreover, if a food manufacturer were to create a cooking series, or a mobile phone company produced programming about music, consumers would not question the link. Once this ‘obvious’ partnership has been forged, it’s crucial that the content follows the traditional rules of marketing and is engaging, creative, relevant and targeted. Now that we are aiming to capture the attention of consumers who can easily look the other way if they find content uninteresting or irrelevant, it’s vital that we don’t miss an opportunity to present both an entertaining concept and a chance to increase their awareness of the brand.

So how do we achieve this? The answer lies in weaving funded content in with a wider integrated platform; a community and network which consumers can tap into and add their thoughts to, making the whole process an organic and live experience. If brands create ideas which look great on TV for 60 minutes but then essentially disappear into the ether, it’s a waste of a golden opportunity to shape a campaign that will live and evolve in many forms, being actively shaped and developed by the audiences it is targeting.

The result of this approach will be a form of ad funded content which captures the imaginations of consumers whilst still fulfilling the needs of the broadcasters. Commissioning editors may well be interested by the thought of a brand stumping up the full cost of a programme, but this alone is not enough; they will need to be assured, as with anything they greenlight, that it’s great content, as for them it’s all about ratings.

From a brand’s perspective, they will look for programming where the entertainment content is just the beginning. They will hope to drive viewers online to continue their experience through Facebook, Twitter or Bebo, ultimately adding to the brand’s success through high levels of customer involvement and advocacy, which ultimately drive sales. Only once advertisers and brands achieve this level of consumer engagement will they have truly cracked the Holy Grail of branded content.

Your Comments

Wednesday, 10 March 2010, 15.56 GMT

Dean makes some good points in this article but I have one major issue with it – why is people’s start point for branded content always TV?

Structurally, TV is not an easy medium to work with in terms of AFP – it can be expensive to produce, and often gets sidelined into off-peak slots – so why do people obsess about it?

Branded content accounts for over 20% of revenue on commercial radio – far higher than TV or other “established” media.

Why?

Well, radio is much more open to incorporating branded content into the schedules, and its less rigid editorial structure allows the flexibility to develop content in association with advertisers that fully exploits the relationship for the benefit of brand, listener and station. And because it’s a true partnership, branded content on radio tends to be broadcast in the most relevant daypart – including the breakfast peak. Finally, radio branded content has always been excellent at getting listeners to interact with the brand by, as Dean succinctly puts it, “weaving funded content in with a wider integrated platform; a community and network which consumers can tap into and add their thoughts to, making the whole process an organic and live experience”.

Branded content has played an active role within the commercial radio schedules since its launch in 1973. Commercial radio programmers therefore understand the sensitivities in finding the right balance in making compelling content for listeners that delivers for the brand better than any other media editors.

Why settle for anything less for your brand?

To find out more about radio’s branded content offering: http://www.rab.co.uk/rab2009/publicationDocs/BrandContBookV17.pdf

Mark Barber
planning director
Radio Advertising Bureau
Wednesday, 10 March 2010, 16.41 GMT

Mark is right. Branded content has always been big in radio and works very well. But people are getting excited about TV AFP because it’s a market that’s seeing a lot of developments, changing attitudes and new regulation.

Important not to conflate the AFP debate with the product placement one (the undue prominence rule for placement is likely to remain for instance) but opportunities are growing fast in TV.

For anyone interested, Thinkbox is running an event ‘Closer to Content’ on these topics on May 13th at the Soho Hotel. Not yet open for booking but if you register you’ll get a notification.

Tess Alps
CEO
Thinkbox

Media Jobs